EncroChat was a proprietary system, and the exact technical details of its encryption and implementation are not publicly documented in detail.
However, based on public reports and similar secure messaging platforms, we can infer plausible technical elements of its implementation.
Below is a technical breakdown based on public knowledge and assumptions:
Technical Details of EncroChat:
1. Devices and Hardware Modifications:
• Base Devices: Off-the-shelf Android phones, often modified to remove or disable standard hardware features.
• Hardware Alterations:
• No GPS to prevent location tracking.
• No camera or microphone to prevent unauthorized recording.
• Physical tamper resistance (e.g., self-destruct mechanisms if tampered with).
• Secure Bootloader: Custom bootloaders with restricted access, preventing unauthorized firmware installations.
2. Operating System:
• Dual OS:
• A “normal” Android OS for decoy purposes.
• A custom OS for secure communications, activated via specific triggers (e.g., PIN codes).
• Encrypted Storage: Full-disk encryption, likely using AES (Advanced Encryption Standard).
3. Encryption Protocols:
• End-to-End Encryption (E2EE):
• Messages encrypted on the sender’s device and decrypted only on the recipient’s device.
• Likely used a combination of:
• Asymmetric Encryption: RSA or ECC (Elliptic Curve Cryptography) for key exchange.
• Symmetric Encryption: AES-256 for encrypting message payloads.
• Key Management:
• Keys were generated and stored locally on devices.
• A “forward secrecy” model (similar to Signal Protocol) may have been used to ensure keys were rotated frequently.
4. Secure Messaging Features:
• Ephemeral Messages:
• Messages set to self-destruct after a certain time.
• Similar to the “Burn after reading” feature in some apps.
• Secure Key Exchange:
• Likely implemented using Diffie-Hellman or Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH).
• Metadata Stripping:
• Messages did not carry metadata (e.g., timestamps, IP addresses).
5. Server Infrastructure:
• Distributed servers hosted internationally to avoid jurisdictional constraints.
• Servers likely acted as relays, forwarding encrypted payloads without storing plaintext messages.
• Communication between devices and servers encrypted using TLS (Transport Layer Security) or custom protocols.
6. Self-Destruction Features:
• Data Wiping:
• A “panic PIN” could trigger full data wipe.
• Remote Destruction:
• Messages or entire devices could be wiped remotely via specific commands.
7. Malware Infiltration:
• Law enforcement compromised the servers and deployed malware to bypass encryption at the endpoint.
• This likely involved injecting malicious payloads into the devices to access plaintext data before encryption or after decryption.
Pseudocode Representation of Key Encryption Concepts:
Below is a simplified pseudocode example of how encryption might have worked in a system like EncroChat:
Key Generation:
from cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric import ec
from cryptography.hazmat.primitives.kdf.hkdf import HKDF
from cryptography.hazmat.primitives.hashes import SHA256
# Generate private keys for both users
private_key_user1 = ec.generate_private_key(ec.SECP256R1())
private_key_user2 = ec.generate_private_key(ec.SECP256R1())
# Derive public keys
public_key_user1 = private_key_user1.public_key()
public_key_user2 = private_key_user2.public_key()
# Shared secret via ECDH
shared_secret = private_key_user1.exchange(ec.ECDH(), public_key_user2)
# Derive encryption key
encryption_key = HKDF(
algorithm=SHA256(),
length=32,
salt=None,
info=b"encrochat key exchange"
).derive(shared_secret)
Message Encryption:
from cryptography.hazmat.primitives.ciphers import Cipher, algorithms, modes
import os
# Encryption key from key exchange
key = encryption_key
# Encrypt message
message = b"Secret message"
iv = os.urandom(16) # Random initialization vector
cipher = Cipher(algorithms.AES(key), modes.CFB(iv))
encryptor = cipher.encryptor()
ciphertext = encryptor.update(message) + encryptor.finalize()
# Send ciphertext and IV
Message Decryption:
# Decrypt message
cipher = Cipher(algorithms.AES(key), modes.CFB(iv))
decryptor = cipher.decryptor()
plaintext = decryptor.update(ciphertext) + decryptor.finalize()
print("Decrypted message:", plaintext.decode())
Law Enforcement Infiltration:
• Police reportedly deployed malware on devices to intercept plaintext messages either before encryption or after decryption.
• This bypassed the encryption entirely, exploiting the endpoint rather than the cryptographic protocols.
--
The exact details of the custom operating system used by EncroChat have not been officially disclosed, but based on available reports, it was a heavily modified version of Android OS tailored specifically for secure communication.
Below are the key points about the custom OS:
Custom OS Characteristics:
1. Android-Based:
• EncroChat’s operating system was a modified version of Android.
• Android was chosen for its open-source nature, allowing developers to customize it to meet their security needs.
2. Dual-OS Mode:
• The phones had two operating environments:
• Normal Mode: A standard-looking Android environment, meant to act as a decoy.
• Secure Mode: A restricted, encrypted environment accessible only via specific triggers (e.g., PIN codes or key combinations).
3. Features Specific to the Custom OS:
• No Access to Common Apps:
• Standard Android apps like Google Play Store, Gmail, and Maps were disabled or removed.
• Tamper Detection:
• The OS could detect physical tampering and potentially trigger data wiping.
• Secure Messaging App:
• A built-in app was used for encrypted messaging and calling.
• Remote Data Wipe:
• Users could remotely delete all data using specific commands or panic PINs.
• No Persistent Logs:
• The OS was designed to avoid creating logs or metadata that could trace user activity.
4. Encryption Integration:
• The custom OS was likely optimized to work seamlessly with EncroChat’s encryption protocols.
• Full-disk encryption was likely implemented to protect stored data.
5. Kernel and Bootloader Modifications:
• Custom Kernel:
• The Android kernel was likely modified for enhanced security.
• Locked Bootloader:
• Prevented unauthorized firmware updates or rooting.
• Secure Boot:
• Ensured that only authorized software could run on the device.
6. Panic Features:
• Users could enter a “panic PIN” to erase all sensitive data instantly.
• Devices could also self-destruct data after a predetermined number of failed unlock attempts.
Why Android?
• Open Source: Android’s source code (AOSP) is freely available, making it customizable.
• Device Compatibility: Android supports a wide range of hardware, making it easier to find suitable devices for modifications.
• Developer Flexibility: It allows developers to modify every layer of the OS, from the kernel to the user interface.
Comparison with Similar Systems:
EncroChat’s custom OS resembled other privacy-focused operating systems like:
• GrapheneOS: Known for its privacy and security enhancements over Android.
• CalyxOS: Another privacy-centric Android distribution.
• Silent Circle’s Silent OS: Used in Silent Phone devices for secure communication.
These operating systems also strip down unnecessary features, implement hardened security measures, and prioritize encrypted communications.
2025
Comments